Thoughts on Education

“There is no way to help a learner to be disciplined, active, and thoroughly engaged unless he perceives a problem to be a problem or whatever is to-be-learned as worth learning, and unless he plays an active role in determining the process of solution” – Neil Postman.

There must be incentive for any action or it will not be performed, no matter how trivial or noble.  Therefore, it is impossible to truly teach a student if they do not want to learn, no matter how great the teacher is or how optimal the curriculum happens to be.  Once the student places value on what taught, it becomes second nature to learn.  There are two complementary components to this:

  1. The subject/topic/problem has to be worth learning or solving, and
  2. The student has to play an active role in the process.

In this scenario, the teacher guides and stimulates the learning process, and the student is ultimately in control of their own learning.  The learning process becomes student-centred, where the learning of a specific subject is guided by the student’s interest, abilities, values and motivations.  It allows for explorations of subjects, not in an equal weighting, but according to the student’s preferences.  The curriculum becomes a programme of “suggested topics”, and puts the teacher in a mentorship role.  In this scenario, it is not possible to have rigid outcomes or indicators for every topic in the curriculum.

Ultimately, it is a matter of quality over quantity in education.  From my own experience, most students do not remember the majority of the subject matter after the class is long over, but they do remember the topics they were interested in, and when they could actively participate in their own learning.


2 thoughts on “Thoughts on Education

  1. Hi Joanna
    I definitely agree with you on a few things. Especially your comment about how students won’t remember the majority of subject matter, and I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one who doesn’t retain the things I’ve been taught. However, it is difficult to make every bit of the lesson interesting. How do you suggest we can appeal to all students to maximize learning capability? Do you think this is all regarding subject matter? Or do you think using different strategies and learning strands would be helpful?


  2. I do agree with you on the concept that students only retain what they are interested in. We are so used to the reading for tests that we become against the knowledge because its forced. This is reflective as a child and also as a university student. Students and people in general are more likely to be active when it matters to them. There is nothing wrong with that but that means as educators we must find ways to grasp student interests in different ways. How can we go about changing th curriculum so that we are not failing students because they are not interested? but finding a way to help them find a place where they excel?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s